
This is an excellent
post on a blog "Video Everywhere and the Citizen Surveillance State" about a
surveillance video camera that some want others hate.
Below are just a few of the comments:But they can't do that right?
Force someone to take down his own webcam, force him to post a self-insulting "apology" on his own website...
Who threatened Adam?
I don't think they had any right to do so.
As far as I see it, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the webcam existed in Adam's privately rented apartment. He uploaded the video -- his video -- to his site. If he chose to edit, he had that prerogative. As far as I know, he broke no laws in filming and streaming his webcam.
That makes it all the more outrageous that thugs could threaten him with brute force -- and succeed at it -- in America, of all places, land of the free and home of the brave.
Putting aside the specifics of Adam's case, do we want a culture where everyone can record everyone else? Imagine if technology advances to the point where
cameras shrink so that they can stream from one's glasses. Imagine if a casual observer can't even tell the camera's there, let alone that it's on and uploading. What happens then?
Posted by: dR December 16, 2008 at 06:34 AM
dR: Indeed. While Adam is a sympathetic character in this tale, and it is wrong that he was "forced" to take the camera and site down, your last point indicates the complexities of the issue.
If someone was constantly uploading video of the sidewalk outside your house, how would you feel?
Or, if there was a good chance that your bus ride to work was streamed to the Web, would you feel safer or feel uncomfortable?
Posted by: The 463: Inside Tech Policy December 16, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Big Brother is here, the web, broadband to every home and apt. has just accelerated it.
I say live with it...the next time the
security camera catches a murderer or rapist in the area or outside that apt. window. The camera will be lauded as a must and more cameras should be installed.